Recruiting Forum Football Talk IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
And then there the barking grown men. I under stand that every team.has their own traditions but when grown a$$ men stop and lean into your face when you are exiting the stadium this is overboard. If I was 20 years younger and did not have a professional license to protect I would ended up in jail last night over some of this.
Every bit of this. I live in Georgia and they are the most insufferable, arrogant, haughty bunch of mf’ers you will ever encounter. I know this universe doesn’t owe me a damn thing other than the air I breathe, but ffs I need them to choke away this national championship that, based on their talent and performance to date, is theirs to lose.

For the folks in here with any sort of complaint about this season, get a life and go pull for someone else. Our program is currently the equivalent of a blue collar worker, working two jobs trying to make ends meet. And those of you complaining are like the guy’s 16 year old daughter b!tching because he can’t buy her a brand new car to drive. Disgusting, shameful assho!es.
 
Agreed, I was thinking in hindsight. In the moment I was all for it. For us to compete with them, we needed the touchdowns. I was mostly commenting on how we could have added more to the total of most points given up by them.
I agree. But I do believe in what Heupel dials up. Now executing those decisions are something else. We didn't play our best game but a lot of that is because the D they were up against. Some of it was our mistakes. This staff and team grow from each challenge and they have yet to stop fighting. I absolutely love that. Toughness and desire go a long long way
 
Hiring an "upgrade" is not a given at all. They could hire someone great or they could hire the next Ron Zook.

No team deserves 17 years of wandering in the wilderness like we’ve had more than Florida. Hopefully, that’s what they’re looking at. And hopefully, we’ve got the guy in Huepel to kick them while they’re down.
 
My thoughts on Yellowstone... spoilers below (i have a different theory than some others on here after watching the opening episodes)

I thought the first 13 minutes were awesome.

I am not sure who organized or did it, but I still have a thought it might be Malcom Beck. We kinda know it isn't Jamie - he leased the land instead of selling it (does that really get him off the hook?). We know it isn't market equities - really doesn't make sense since they need the government help to secure the deal.

I believe Malcom Beck is alive, he was saved by the militia when John left the field that night.

He is now the leader of the militia and out for revenge. They had the time to plan it and the guns and ammo required. Also the "party planner" from the episode in the casino totally looked like a militia boy.

Jamie's bio dad is also part of the militia, he used Jamie for information about the family and ranch and passed it onto the militia for the attacks.

It was odd that Rips house was burned down. That had to be personal - maybe from Jamie or from Walker?

Mo knows who did it and will bring that person to John. Can't freaking wait. That's the biggest cliff hanger from this episode.

Loved how Rip used the snake to kill Rourke. Genius.

I also just love Beth - I am the bigger Bear!!!

What happened to Monica and Tate? Where did they go?

100% the body they dug up was from the 1883 clip - buried with the steer they gave them for meat.

Jimmy getting injured sucked - I think it would have been better to die. Interested to see where they take this character now that they are shipping him off.

What happened to the little boy who John stopped to help change the tire for? We saw his mother get mowed down, but it looked like he hid in the ditch?
My thoughts exactly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpringBokVol
Wouldn't be the first time it's happened to Kirby.

When was the other time? Losing Chaney? I don’t think Kirby considered that a huge loss.

Chaney made $950k at UGA.

Lanning makes 1.7-1.8.

I don’t believe they are valued the same. That co-DC makes like 600k. He’d take it in heartbeat.
 
He had a game that was below standard FOR HIM. He has played very well and yesterday, against the best defense in the country, he played OK.
He had a few passes that sailed on him.That’s what I’m talking about. I’m not saying that I think he is a bad quarterback,he’s not. I’m just saying the times he threw the sailers was uncharacteristic of him.
 
He had a few passes that sailed on him.That’s what I’m talking about. I’m not saying that I think he is a bad quarterback,he’s not. I’m just saying the times he threw the sailers was uncharacteristic of him.
OK, yes, he did miss a couple. That does not make it a "bad" game. Not up to his standards, but compared to all other QB who have played against Georgia, better than most.
 
Question because I honestly don't remember for certain.

But didn't someone from UT say that most of the recipients of any impermissible funds, would be getting to play in bowl games with other teams, as reasoning behind not taking bowl eligiblity from the innocent players still here?

Thought the NCAA would have to officially look into the matter and confirm TN's findings on a player before making them ineligible?

Yeah, that’s probably the key. Someone tried to poison the well though. Told those guys “better get out why ya can!” and sadly it worked.
 
He had the kind of game that playing against one of the best and deepest defenses we've seen in CFB in the last ten years can make you play...especially considering playing with a ultra thin mediocre line and your two best RBs beat to hell.

After the 💩ty QB play we have seen here for the last few years you should have a greater understanding of what a "bad game" is.

He actually had a pretty good game against UGA (stats back it up) all things considered. He just didn't have a really good-great day when we needed him to the most to have a chance to win.

It kills me that folks act like Hooker was playing in a vacuum out there.
Like I said in a different post I was talking about the passes that sailed on him.That’s all.But those few throws didn’t help the team.💩happens!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ulysees E. McGill
So I heard that bowl cut said in an interview that he talked to Peyton before the game and he said Peyton asked him to recruit his son….😳. I didn’t hear that interview - did any of you hear it?
 
OK, yes, he did miss a couple. That does not make it a "bad" game. Not up to his standards, but compared to all other QB who have played against Georgia, better than most.
The best since Dobbs by far!Look,I’m not putting him down.I think he is a very good quarterback but I’m not convinced that it was Georgia’s defense that was the cause of few passes sailing on him.Anything else?
 
  • Like
Reactions: drvenner
Status
Not open for further replies.

VN Store



Back
Top