volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,619
While I agree the Bork incident started the extreme polarization in DC, it didn’t really effect the average person that didn’t pay that much attention to politics. The next 3 you listed changed how much Americans paid attention to politics imo.The polarization began with the treatment of Reagan's SC nominee in 1987 . Robert Bork preceded the internet, Fox News, Rush Limbaugh on a national level , and the changes brought about by elimination of the Fairness Doctrine.
Now I know for a fact she does. I bet you sit down to pee. You probably convinced yourself its easier that way so the misses doesn't kick your ass for leaving the toilet seat up. Its ok Luther. You're a vanilla carbon copy of every male liberal in this country.That's a telling glimpse into your archaic biases. There are always hints in what things one wrongly views to be mutually exclusive.
30 minutes.
I have been talking about what kicked off the divide between the politicians.While I agree the Bork incident started the extreme polarization in DC, it didn’t really effect the average person that didn’t pay that much attention to politics. The next 3 you listed changed how much Americans paid attention to politics imo.
It takes a special type of dumb to double down on a known losing hand.Now I know for a fact she does. I bet you sit down to pee. You probably convinced yourself its easier that way so the misses doesn't kick your ass for leaving the toilet seat up. Its ok Luther. You're a vanilla carbon copy of every male liberal in this country.
It died a just death in 87. It would still be in place if not for the expansion of media outlets. There was only ever one viewpoint presented on the alphabet channels. I'm sure you won't see it that way but the fairness doctrine is unconstitutional and would have died sooner had expansion happened sooner.Really?
It allowed giving one side without having to provide a rebuttal.
Like with everything else, the liberals want to control it.It died a just death in 87. It would still be in place if not for the expansion of media outlets. There was only ever one viewpoint presented on the alphabet channels. I'm sure you won't see it that way but the fairness doctrine is unconstitutional and would have died sooner had expansion happened sooner.
It died a just death in 87. It would still be in place if not for the expansion of media outlets. There was only ever one viewpoint presented on the alphabet channels. I'm sure you won't see it that way but the fairness doctrine is unconstitutional and would have died sooner had expansion happened sooner.
I'm taking Thumper's advice and sitting this one out.
Sincerely sorry to hear that BB. Terrible stuff.At the time of my sister's death, she had lost about 40% of her lung tissue and was on a waiting list for a transplant but never made it. A blood clot formed in her lung and moved to her heart. She didn't smoke... it's just something that happened.
Sorry about your grandfather.