Wow, that argument has never before been advanced on this forum. You put some deep thought into it.
If you dedicated yourself to it for weeks you couldn’t have posted anything more vapid and meaningless.
See if you can follow, try really hard here: we have employed other coaches in the past who had vastly more experience than I do coaching football…And yet, somehow, mysteriously, it came to me from the ether, this preternatural premonition that maybe, just perhaps, because I have two eyes and a brain and have watched really good teams coached by really good coaches, I might have the ability to distinguish between good coaching decisions and stupid ones, or good coaches and mediocre ones. Some on here like you mocked those of us who first dared to suggest Derek Dooley might not be a great coach; then you mocked us again when we said the same about Butch Jones, and you did it again when we said it about Jeremy Pruitt. Because all those guys had way more coaching experience than I and the other detractors had, so if course it was impossible that we might be right in judging them incompetent.
Heupel has done some things the three before him didn’t; he has also made some poor decisions, and is making one right now that his immediate predecessor also made.