Jxn Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2011
- Messages
- 8,085
- Likes
- 14,554
What Are the Seven Deadly Sins? A Biblical GuideWebster’s dictionary of 1828:
Greedy, adjective, Latin gradior, and probably signifies reaching forward.
1. Having a keen appetite for food or drink; ravenous; voracious; very hungry; followed by of; as a lion that is greedy of his prey. Psalms 17:12
2. Having a keen desire of any thing; eager to obtain; as greedy of gain.
Language does change, but I wonder how much the change in the definition of greed has been guided by liberals?
What Are the Seven Deadly Sins? A Biblical Guide
Many think the deadly seven are recorded in the Bible. Even though each of the seven is a sin, this list is not contained in Scripture. The history of this sin categorization began in the year 400.
Two centuries later, Pope Gregory 1 refined the inventory to seven. Almost every sin can be placed in one of these seven categories. Isaiah 14:13-14 tells us pride and selfishness are related to each of the seven and are viewed as the root causes of all sin.
7. Greed
Definition: a selfish and excessive desire for more of something (such as money) than is needed (material goods)
Counterpart: Generosity, kindness
I suspect greed has been nuanced more by religious dogma and thought than by liberals.Webster’s dictionary of 1828:
Greedy, adjective, Latin gradior, and probably signifies reaching forward.
1. Having a keen appetite for food or drink; ravenous; voracious; very hungry; followed by of; as a lion that is greedy of his prey. Psalms 17:12
2. Having a keen desire of any thing; eager to obtain; as greedy of gain.
Language does change, but I wonder how much the change in the definition of greed has been guided by liberals?
Look forward to seeing them.Yes sir, there are patches of virgin timber around our area as EasternVol alluded too. I trail maintain for SMHC and the ATC, so next time I am out there I will take some pictures .
They can both have levels of guilt. No contradictions there.I like math. I did the math on a holier-than-thou notion shared earlier.
This notion, specifically (context is a wealthy business owner who is said to be greedy...the bad kind):
He obviously could have paid his employees more or done other things with the wealth he is accumulating.
I chose Amazon's Bezos for my math. Jeff makes a salary from Amazon of about 1.5 million per year. His 117B net worth is in stocks and investments. He would be required to sell assets for the exercise to be viable.
If Jeff sold 11.7 B in assets every year, he would net (after cap gains) 9.36B.
Amazon employs about 1.5M people. 9.36B / 1.5M = $6,240
$6,240 / 52 weeks = $120. $120 / 40 hours (not all employees are FT) = $3
Assuming Jeff did not have appreciation of remaining assets, he would be worth a few million after 10 years. The employee would make an additional $3 per hour.
The Amazon stock sold could have negative implications on the ownership, direction, and future of the business. Diluting the capital to employees could also incur opportunity costs.
If Jeff is guilty with the sin of greed, aren't those proposing this approach guilty with the sin of coveting their neighbor's possessions?