Stacey Abrams chosen to give Democratic response to Trump's State of the Union

Your perception is warped if you don’t think the great community organizer and his elitist one world order is not a hard pull to the socialized left . Your party mossed the mark when you thought most Americans wanted to become like Europe again and you saw what Trump did with that little Snafu . The harder you pull us toward socialism and the left , the greater that rubber band is going to snap back . You have a problem taking lessons from history even when it was as recent as two years ago and we all know what happens we you ignore history .
Like I said, your perspective is warped. Most Americans voted for Gore in 2000, Obama in 2008, Obama in 2012, and Clinton in 2016. Be cautious when using that "most Americans" phrase. The snap back from the Trump fiasco is what will be interesting to behold. You guys are missing your waning opportunities to rebuke him and maintain a shred of dignity.
 
Like I said, your perspective is warped. Most Americans voted for Gore in 2000, Obama in 2008, Obama in 2012, and Clinton in 2016. Be cautious when using that "most Americans" phrase. The snap back from the Trump fiasco is what will be interesting to behold. You guys are missing your waning opportunities to rebuke him and maintain a shred of dignity.
You fail as a proselytizer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
What did I say first ? The smart play is to elect someone as close to center as possible to stop this snapping effect . It’s not a hard problem to fix .
So that is what you recommend for republicans? Rebuke Trump?
 
Nothing is distorting my view , Barry was a global elitist that tried his hardest to get us to become more like Europe .. that’s a hard pull left from where we were correct ? You bet it is and that thinking allowed Trump to use that disdain for that idea against Hills
Again, overlooking the other 16 repub. candidates.
 
I hate to tell you this, but she won't get as far as your last candidate, Jill Stein.

I said earlier "if she's still around when teh primaries get to TN".

If she's not, very unlikely that she is I'll reevaluate.
 
I'm all about moving the needle. It's sometimes best when people don't even realize the needle moved.
your needle is somewhere around here:

Hay_1300Lede.jpg
 
Who cares who gives the rebuttal or if they hold office? Every rebuttal I've ever seen has been completely predictable and horribly boring. I think they should let me give the rebuttal. I could do it now.
"Pretty much everything he just said is factually incorrect and a good portion was just flat out lies; so please go to three fact checking sites and make your own determinations. Trump continues to play to his base at the expense of the rest of the country. His power comes from divisiveness. We will gladly continue to work with Trump on anything that benefits the country and will continue to fight him on things that will harm the country for as long as he remains in office."


I will sleep better at night knowing Schumer and Pelosi are fine, upstanding, and factually correct politicians. And that injun woman too.
 
They equal the same result.
They tell completely different stories and indicate different potentials. Time is a continuum. A snapshot doesn't capture the past or the future but it can provide clues to both.
 
Like I said, your perspective is warped. Most Americans voted for Gore in 2000, Obama in 2008, Obama in 2012, and Clinton in 2016. Be cautious when using that "most Americans" phrase. The snap back from the Trump fiasco is what will be interesting to behold. You guys are missing your waning opportunities to rebuke him and maintain a shred of dignity.

Gore lost , Barry caused the left pull and Clinton lost .. you are 0-3
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64

VN Store



Back
Top