The Bama INT returned for a "TD" against SC....

#76
#76
Every play is reviewed even if there is no official time out taken. The replay officials obviously saw enough to confirm the ruling on the field without having to waste time to make a random Vol fan happy.
 
#78
#78
IPorange said:
Int-td.jpg
Click to expand...

Give it up, the ball is NOT in his hand in that photo you posted.....

http://i47.photobucket.com/albums/f193/born-n-raisedvol/Alabama-int.png

In both pictures his right foot is just in the end zone and the picture posted above CLEARLY shows the ball NOT in his hand.

The play should have been reviewed, bottom line. I don't care if the ref was looking right at it.... it's obviously too close to call for the naked eye. The ref made the right call on the field, a TD should have been called, BUT a review was in order and very well may have reversed the original call.

So you're saying if that was against UT, you would have been just fine without them taking a second look at it? You're lying if you say you would.
 
#79
#79
timmy said:
Every play is reviewed even if there is no official time out taken. The replay officials obviously saw enough to confirm the ruling on the field without having to waste time to make a random Vol fan happy.
Click to expand...

:good!:
 
#80
#80
I am not the one not giving it up. The ruling is on my side. The pic you just linked is after mine. I am not denying that he tossed the ball very quickly, but he definitely crossed the plane before doing so. That gentleman I circled agreed, as did the review guys in the booth.
 
#81
#81
timmy said:
Every play is reviewed even if there is no official time out taken. The replay officials obviously saw enough to confirm the ruling on the field without having to waste time to make a random Vol fan happy.
Click to expand...

IMO, they were oblivious to this even happening, just like 99% of the people in this thread. They were watching the game just like everyone else who's posted in this thread, and nobody but one poster stated they were even aware of it even happening. People were so unaware of it happening they thought I was speaking of a different play when it was obvious (if you read the OP) I was speaking of the Bama play.

Also, I don't believe they (the review booth) had enough time to make an accurate judgment of the play in question. If you'll notice in the game, it was treated like a normal TD was scored, the extra point was kicked directly after the TD and IMO, there's no way, in the time that was allowed, that they could have made an accurate call that it wasn't a fumble. They would have needed to have more time (a review timeout) to make an accurate assessment of the play.
 
#82
#82
Also, there was question as to whether he stepped out of bounds on the return.... that wasn't reviewed either......... and even if it was reviewed in the booth, there's no way they had time to review both the part of the return AND the "fumble."

There should have been an official timeout called for the review of both aspects in question of the return.
 
#83
#83
UT's#1Fan said:
Also, there was question as to whether he stepped out of bounds on the return.... that wasn't reviewed either......... and even if it was reviewed in the booth, there's no way they had time to review both the part of the return AND the "fumble."

There should have been an official timeout called for the review of both aspects in question of the return.
Click to expand...

Since you are so deadset on arguing this, what does it matter if the ball was ruled down at the one? Even if SC gets a highly unlikely stop, bama still won by 2 td's.
 
#84
#84
IPorange said:
I am not the one not giving it up. The ruling is on my side. The pic you just linked is after mine. I am not denying that he tossed the ball very quickly, but he definitely crossed the plane before doing so. That gentleman I circled agreed, as did the review guys in the booth.
Click to expand...

Do you not agree with the notion that they might have been reviewing whether Barron stepped out of bounds and failed to notice/review the fumble in question? There's no way they had time to accurately review and conclude on both aspects.
 
#85
#85
timmy said:
Since you are so deadset on arguing this, what does it matter if the ball was ruled down at the one? Even if SC gets a highly unlikely stop, bama still won by 2 td's.
Click to expand...

Because it was kicked out of the end zone.... no TD, no momentum swing Bama, SC’s ball, 0-0. That’s why. And it could easily happen again to UT....
 
#86
#86
UT's#1Fan said:
Because it was kicked out of the end zone.... no TD, no momentum swing Bama, SC’s ball, 0-0. That’s why. And it could easily happen again to UT....
Click to expand...

Also, nothing was stopping Spurrier from throwing the challenge flag. I guess he was just giving in to the bama machine.
 
#87
#87
UT's#1Fan said:
Do you not agree with the notion that they might have been reviewing whether Barron stepped out of bounds and failed to notice/review the fumble in question? There's no way they had time to accurately review and conclude on both aspects.
Click to expand...

I do not agree with the notion, because there was an official staring right out the ball carrier as he crossed the goal line, from the side on which he was carrying the ball. There is no way he could have missed that call.
 
#88
#88
timmy said:
Every play is reviewed even if there is no official time out taken. The replay officials obviously saw enough to confirm the ruling on the field without having to waste time to make a random Vol fan happy.
Click to expand...

although, I am SURE that if the SEC office was worried that UT's#1Fan thinks we might get the short end of the stick against Bammer, they most certainly will call him for a ruling.
 
#89
#89
timmy said:
Also, nothing was stopping Spurrier from throwing the challenge flag. I guess he was just giving in to the bama machine.
Click to expand...

It was not an obvious mistake... The views that showed it really well came from the cable camera which is shown only on the broadcast version... It was not shown in the stadium. Every other view showed an apparent TD, except the cable camera.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#90
#90
UT's#1Fan said:
Because it was kicked out of the end zone.... no TD, no momentum swing Bama, SC’s ball, 0-0. That’s why. And it could easily happen again to UT....
Click to expand...

I feel pretty confident that the refs won't conspire to ignore a Bama defender's premature release of the football prior to crossing the goal line after returning a Crompton touchdown.

Call it a hunch.
 
#91
#91
T-TownVol said:
although, I am SURE that if the SEC office was worried that UT's#1Fan thinks we might get the short end of the stick against Bammer, they most certainly will call him for a ruling.
Click to expand...

I doubt the SEC cares what I think.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#92
#92
UT's#1Fan said:
It was not an obvious mistake... The views that showed it really well came from the cable camera which is shown only on the broadcast version... It was not shown in the stadium. Every other view showed an apparent TD, except the cable camera.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

You are the only person that watched the game that things he fumbled.
 
#93
#93
Jaytrain5 said:
I feel pretty confident that the refs won't conspire to ignore a Bama defender's premature release of the football prior to crossing the goal line after returning a Crompton touchdown.

Call it a hunch.
Click to expand...
tinfoil-hat.jpg
 
#94
#94
UT's#1Fan said:
Because it was kicked out of the end zone.... no TD, no momentum swing Bama, SC’s ball, 0-0. That’s why. And it could easily happen again to UT....
Click to expand...

"Mr. Slive, I have UT's#1Fan on the line....he says that he will be glad to sit by his phone on Saturday so that you can call him during the game."
 
#95
#95
timmy said:
You are the only person that watched the game that things he fumbled.
Click to expand...

I disagree... There have been several people come out and say it was a close call that it should have been reviewed, which is all I'm saying.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#99
#99
T-TownVol said:
"Mr. Slive, I have UT's#1Fan on the line....he says that he will be glad to sit by his phone on Saturday so that you can call him during the game."
Click to expand...

Nah, I wouldn't have time for that. There are too many games for me to monitor them all. Plus do you really think Slive would call me? No way.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top