Man, it is really nuts how 90% of this board is ruled by emotion and bias towards their team. The committee is biased against UT, in love with the Big 10, can't wait to screw the SEC and the Vols. Have you ever considered developing opinions based on rational arguments and logic? What if instead of grand conspiracies, the simplest answer is the most accurate? That the case for those Big 10 teams, particularly Ohio St and Penn St, is more compelling than Tennessee's case? I guess this is what you get when people that can't see their own biases have 2 digit IQ's. I mean, the refs are out to get us every week also, right? LOL...
Because the committee is run by a Big 10 person. The bias is overly overt. I think that's why. There's no reasonable or rationale explanation that Ohio St would only drop four places after what happened last week. Tennessee damn sure wouldn't have gotten the benefit of the doubt like that if we had lost to Vanderbilt. Even if we went into that game at 10-1. Not only would we have dropped further, we would have dropped completely out of the field while 9-3 Bama got in. This isn't directly an SEC issue. It's more a brand bias issues (and the fact the chair is led by the Big 10).