The Harris Doctrine

#301
#301
CobbVol said:
Agreed. It has taken both parties decades to get to this point and will require both parties committed to reducing spending at the federal level. Thinking that an DC outsider like Trump who came into office in 2017 would be successful right out of the gate is disingenuous at best.
Click to expand...

Any significant reduction at the federal level will mean reset, the private sector is unable to sustain the growth needed to pay interest on the prior. Exponential growth is a requirement for the current system.

Nobody is going to want to take responsibility for that. I wouldn't.

Once you go to a usury based system i.e. attaching interest to your medium of exchange, it all starts to go vertical at some point, that point was around 2008-2010. People thousands of years ago figured this out.

If the system doesn't generate the needed amount of new credit the system will start to collapse, see 2008. There is no out, there is only in. A simple equation that has a simple result i.e. collapse. The people that start the scam (rinse and repeat) are long gone by the time the results come down.
 
Last edited:
#306
#306
C-south said:
It’s like buying a powerball ticket when the jackpot is $100 million, they make you pay taxes on $100 million, then you lose.
Click to expand...
And they could also say that your house is now worth $X more than you paid for it. So you pay tax on that difference. Then, when the interstate runs thru your neighborhood and it's value gets cut in half, well... too bad for you because there's no deduction for losses. So you paid taxes on gains you will never see.

It's theft on steroids
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman, Sea Ray and Orangeburst
#308
#308
SpaceCoastVol said:
And they could also say that your house is now worth $X more than you paid for it. So you pay tax on that difference. Then, when the interstate runs thru your neighborhood and it's value gets cut in half, well... too bad for you because there's no deduction for losses. So you paid taxes on gains you will never see.

It's theft on steroids
Click to expand...

It’s definitely one of the dumbest ideas they’ve come up with and there’s been plenty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and UT_Dutchman
#311
#311
jmacvols1 said:
She wanted no tax on tips, now she wants border walls....stealing from Trumps playbook...again

Loading…

www.axios.com

Click to expand...

The media is amazing. It’s like she didn’t exist under the current presidential administration. She is a new entity and an unknown.

The media is the single largest threat to our republic. Neither party or candidate is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, jaybird_1981, jmacvols1 and 1 other person
#312
#312
barknoxbrawler said:
The media is amazing. It’s like she didn’t exist under the current presidential administration. She is a new entity and an unknown.

The media is the single largest threat to our republic. Neither party or candidate is.
Click to expand...
The mainstream media is the mouthpiece for one party and it's not the Republican Party.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and SpaceCoastVol
#314
#314
CobbVol said:
Agreed. It has taken both parties decades to get to this point and will require both parties committed to reducing spending at the federal level. Thinking that an DC outsider like Trump who came into office in 2017 would be successful right out of the gate is disingenuous at best.
Click to expand...
He's the second biggest spender and abuser in history. He said he wouldn't be. Of course he should be held accountable. He has zero interest in curbing spending. Jesus the man was publicly pounding the Fed to keep rate low while he was POTUS
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#315
#315
volfanhill said:
He's the second biggest spender and abuser in history. He said he wouldn't be. Of course he should be held accountable. He has zero interest in curbing spending. Jesus the man was publicly pounding the Fed to keep rate low while he was POTUS
Click to expand...
Between Trump and the democrat ticket, which do you think will spend less money in DC and keep your taxes down over the next 4 years?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and LadyVolette
#316
#316
CobbVol said:
Between Trump and the democrat ticket, which do you think will spend less money in DC and keep your taxes down over the next 4 years?
Click to expand...
We paid 14k less a year with our LLC under Trump.. under Obama we wrote a check for 44k one year.. hubby refuses to quarterly pay…my husband wrote Thanks Obama in the memo part with the number above it.. they cashed it 😂 I dread tax season
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol and Sea Ray
#317
#317
LadyVolette said:
We paid 14k less a year with our LLC under Trump.. under Obama we wrote a check for 44k one year.. hubby refuses to quarterly pay…my husband wrote Thanks Obama in the memo part with the number above it.. they cashed it 😂 I dread tax season
Click to expand...
Kamala in 2019 while running for the WH proposed a 35% tax on corporations/LLCs. Today she has stated she will increase the corporate rate from 21% to 28%. You have to believe it will be 35% eventually if she gets in office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LadyVolette
#318
#318
CobbVol said:
Kamala in 2019 while running for the WH proposed a 35% tax on corporations/LLCs. Today she has stated she will increase the corporate rate from 21% to 28%. You have to believe it will be 35% eventually if she gets in office.
Click to expand...
She’s going to say whatever it takes to get elected and then do whatever the h3ll she wants
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman and Sea Ray
#319
#319
CobbVol said:
Kamala in 2019 while running for the WH proposed a 35% tax on corporations/LLCs. Today she has stated she will increase the corporate rate from 21% to 28%. You have to believe it will be 35% eventually if she gets in office.
Click to expand...


How will she do that? Exactly?
 
#322
#322
The next turn of the Harris Doctrine- fear and appeasement towards Russia.

Multiple reports from Western media indicate that the US government is prohibiting the United Kingdom (UK) from allowing Ukraine to use Storm Shadow missiles to strike military targets in Russia. The Financial Times (FT) reported on August 27 that a source familiar with the matter stated that Ukraine's use of British and French Storm Shadows may require access to American intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance in areas where Russian forces are jamming the GPS signals that the missiles use for targeting.

Institute for the Study of War

Multiple reports from Western media indicate that the US government is prohibiting the United Kingdom (UK) from allowing Ukraine to use Storm Shadow missiles to strike military targets in Russia. The Financial Times (FT) reported on August 27 that a
www.understandingwar.org www.understandingwar.org
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top