NighthawkVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2007
- Messages
- 13,076
- Likes
- 46,351
Sure, unless they review it and decide there was no touch and he flopped. Then Santi gets technical foul and Cuse gets a FT.I mean he didn't get the foul and they aren't going to penalize for a review, seems like a good chance to clear his head and get a break plus if they decide it's a flagrant we get shots and the ball... Pretty win win situation I think to ask for it.
I guess they think they need to drop mentions of that stuff because of some illusion that they are going to pick up viewers from the Swift fans. They drop that crap all the time and it’s ridiculous. Won’t touch tonight’s MNF game, period. Tired of hearing about it.I was stunned that they even mentioned that ridiculous stuff. I seriously wonder are there people who actually care and are interested in it … or is that just ESPN pushing the NFL trying to make it more appealing league? Basically makes me disrespectfully the league more than I do already.
Sure, unless they review it and decide there was no touch and he flopped. Then Santi gets technical foul and Cuse gets a FT.
It's just the principle of it for me, I guess. He knows he didn't get elbowed. Just take the ball and play on. Staff didn't ask for anything initially. It was Santi. Maybe they asked again during the break since it went to commercial. Who knows.But Mintz created the contact and jumped into him, that wasn't a flop at all. It was just whether or not Mintz elbowed him in the face or not.
Either way they stopped playing because Santi was still on the deck so it wasn't a big deal for them to go to the review, hell staff might have been asking for it themselves.
It's just the principle of it for me, I guess. He knows he didn't get elbowed. Just take the ball and play on. Staff didn't ask for anything initially. It was Santi. Maybe they asked again during the break since it went to commercial. Who knows.
It was just as annoying when they did it. We don't have to agree on the idea of selling a foul and whether it's beneficial. But Santi didn't get hit in the face by Mintz's elbow on the way up which is when he tried to sell it. Replay confirmed as much.He did get hit in the face though so he might have thought it was the elbow. Cause as they fell Mintz flailed and raked him on the way down.
I think Awaka is probably the only player I've yet to see sell a foul so I don't really care. Grant was notorious for it, as was Fulky.