To be honest, I'd be okay with it if there aren't any Civil War/Confederate symbols on the suit. If your mascot is Rebels and that's deemed okay, no reason an old man dressed up should offend anyone.Initial reaction was that is more racially insensitive than col. reb. Bear looks like he has black face make up on. I never thought the old mascot was that big of deal.
I understand what you're saying. We don't chant "Go Dogs" or anything like that.fair point, but i think i'd feel more weird about it if he actually appeared on our main logos rather than just a mascot by design (like....well the Titans' mascot i guess or probably a few more pro teams follow it too)
Only if they release it into the stands.Yeah, so does Memphis. I just think having an actual bear in the stadium would be harder than having a tiger. But idk, maybe it would work out for them. I think having a real-live bear during the games could take away from the lameness of the mascot.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
It's thought that there are no actual wolverines in Michigan. There's only been one sighting in 200+years.
My guess would be their aren't too many Tigers in Louisiana, Alabama(not in any Elephants neither), and South Carolina.
The Trojans were a fictitious people who's city was burned to the ground...
Etc