southgatevol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,576
- Likes
- 2,106
Did you state "scahadenfreude"? No.
Did I say you stated "schadenfreude"? Did you say that I said that you stated "schadenfreude"?
It is a privately owned business. If the NFL can prevent Kapernick from kneeling they can certainly set the policy for all players to stay in the locker room. It is simply the other side of the coin.
Have mercy. To be clear, I do not wish for anyone to suffer, not the owners nor the players. I am apathetic to any monetary woes the owners could possibly suffer due to a strike. I think most could endure such an event and probably survive. Is apathy to a millionaire/billionaire's monetary woes a mental illness? If so, I am guilty.
I think it was nothing more than an attention getting gesture led by a spoiled, washed up QB that couldnt handle the fact that he lost his job.
Then the owners would really feel it in their wallets.
Sure. I know they would suffer. I know I would REALLY feel sorry for them.
Schadenfreude is mental illness.
Your worldview basically depends on the attitude that he just posted, doesn't it?
Capitalism depends on market steering based on some sort of (financial) suffering that stems from consumer preference.
Why chastise him for stating such?
Have mercy. To be clear, I do not wish for anyone to suffer, not the owners nor the players. I am apathetic to any monetary woes the owners could possibly suffer due to a strike. I think most could endure such an event and probably survive. Is apathy to a millionaire/billionaire's monetary woes a mental illness? If so, I am guilty.
I read an article last week in passing that stated they thought he still had starter talent. No idea of the agenda of the writer. And while his stats were down I do think hes better than the QBs some of the teams fielded this year.
If you expect Capitalism to work, you should want some degree of "suffering", else the market doesn't work. That's what it depends on.
Your worldview basically depends on the attitude that he just posted, doesn't it?
Capitalism depends on market steering based on some sort of (financial) suffering that stems from consumer preference.
Why chastise him for stating such?
I would say he is a middle of the pack QB right now. The pulled Jat Culter out of retirement, Josh McCown, Jacoby Brissett, Trevor Siemian, Drew Stanton, Sam Bradford, Nathan Peterman, Mike Glennon, Matt Cassel, Geno Smith, TJ Yates, Brock Osweiler, Brian Hoyer and others out there over Kapernick. I'm not saying he's Joe Montana, but he is far better than these guys. And without even looking at the stats, I bet if you took away Matt Cassel, he might have more playoff wins than everyone else on this list combined.
There are winners and losers in every system. The existence of losers in whatever system you support does not mean you get off on others losing.
You try so hard to nail me for hypocrisy and you end up making these huge and stupid stretches that make no sense. I'm sure I'll prove to be hypocritical at some point, we all do it. Just be patient and pick your battles. :good!:
I do agree with you on his ability to play. I also believe he did it to himself.
I would say he is a middle of the pack QB right now. The pulled Jat Culter out of retirement, Josh McCown, Jacoby Brissett, Trevor Siemian, Drew Stanton, Sam Bradford, Nathan Peterman, Mike Glennon, Matt Cassel, Geno Smith, TJ Yates, Brock Osweiler, Brian Hoyer and others out there over Kapernick. I'm not saying he's Joe Montana, but he is far better than these guys. And without even looking at the stats, I bet if you took away Matt Cassel, he might have more playoff wins than everyone else on this list combined.
You wanted to "nail" me for "getting off" on someone else's misfortune which I never stated. Then you want to call someone else out for trying to "nail" you? Is this hypocritical?