THUNDERWANG
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2009
- Messages
- 170
- Likes
- 5
He would clearly be an offensive tackle. he could very easily weigh 315 ibs within 6 months. With his natural athleticism he could at least make an NFL Roster.
I love how you have a handful of ex basketball players who went on to become great football players, and suddenly Stokes is going to be one of those guys.
You were the one who insisted he would NOT be a TE. The position he plays in BB and his size + athleticism is conducive to him playing the TE position. He is already used to going up and snatching the ball in traffic and boxing out a defender...things you want from a big TE.Lol, talk about contradicting.
Who says he'd be a dominant TE? I didn't know you were paid to judge how well a player would transition from basketball to football.
You were the one who insisted he would NOT be a TE. The position he plays in BB and his size + athleticism is conducive to him playing the TE position. He is already used to going up and snatching the ball in traffic and boxing out a defender...things you want from a big TE.
I would put money down that he is just as fast as Jason Witten. You do not have to be a burner to be an effective tight end. I am in no way comparing his football ability to Witten's but I would probably pick Stokes if they were both lining up to run the 40.
Because I'm siding with common sense and lots of precedence. You, one the other hand, just come out and state matter of factly, without a single thing to base it on.How's that any different from you insisting he would be?
We also just brought in two highly touted EE's that will play TE.
He's already got the size for DE, has a big wingspan, and is athletic.
We need DL help a lot more than we need another TE.