UT fans keep making a big deal of bigger and stronger. It won't be much of a difference.
Tell you what. Let's divide players into two groups. One group is bigger, stronger, more athletic, quicker, etc man for man than the other group. Which one do you want?
It WILL be a big difference and is THE biggest difference. Your quick guys have quickness at 5'10" 175. UT's are quicker/faster/stronger at 6' 200 lbs.
UT fans keep yakking about the SEC. UT has come out on the winning side of 4 SEC contests in 3 years. I've said that the facts are that UT is a basement program in the SEC today.
And that means absolutely NOTHING positive for your case. If USU had played the same schedule over that period the results would have been worse. You aren't equal to any of the SEC programs UT has been struggling with. There are few if any of your players that could make the two deep for UGA, USCe, Aub, Bama, LSU, UF, etc.
And no, it isn't a "fact" that UT is a basement program "today". It IS a fact that UT has spent some time in the basement after a run of success that USU has never seen. But where the program is NOW depends on what happens NOW and is manifested this fall.
But FWIW... you'd struggle to beat UK if you endured the grind of UT's schedule. UT has played 4 of the last 6 NC contenders... have you ever played even one?
UT fans keep talking about the history and tradition of their program. While impressive, it is HISTORY.
So are the last 3 years of USU football... and the coach that made them happen... and the vast majority of the players that made them happen. Same is true for UT...
All you want to talk about "objectively" is history. You just want to limit it to the period you want to talk about.
I've said that the players in the UT program today have NOT been anywhere near to competitive in their league, have NOT played in bowl games, and have NOT "grown up" in a college football environment where they understand the culture and work required to compete at the highest level.
And USU has never competed at the highest level... so even if you are right (which I don't think you are) about UT... you are in the exact same boat... with inferior talent.
UT fans keep talking about a butt-whoopin. Based on all of the above and based on the on-the-field performances of the two teams over the past several years, I have said that I believe it will be close.
Ah, so history matters when convenient to you but not when it isn't... gotcha. You are complete denial here of the difference in levels of competition these two programs have faced.
The talent differential might be enough to swing it for UT.
There is no "might" about it. UT is more talented. It isn't close. Your hopes hinge on breaks and the possibility that your coaching might make the difference up.
Along with the home field, they certainly have many advantages. However, I won't be a bit surprised if Utah State comes out and smacks UT in the mouth pretty hard and comes away with a victory. We will see.
Well... at least you dropped the pretense of being rational. If you win, it won't be because of talent... it will be strongly in spite of it.
All of this has become fairly circuitous again. Time for a break.
That's because you never actually deal with the weaknesses in what you are arguing other than with handwaving.