Sgt_Nick_Fury
Danneskjöld's love child.
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2010
- Messages
- 11,675
- Likes
- 18,154
This article was written in 22. At that time ic claimed 78 studies were “promising “ for the treatment of covid 19 with ivermectin.Setting the Record Straight on Ivermectin ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Ivermectin has a distinguished history, and it may have benefits comparable to those of penicillin. The anti-parasitic’s discovery led to a Nobel Prize.brownstone.org
There was no conspiracy to suppress ivermectin.
What would your explanation be for the instantaneous mass-labeling it as "horse paste," despite its widespread use in humans, which likely saves hundreds of thousands of lives a year and earned it the Nobel prize?There was no conspiracy to suppress ivermectin.
He should preform a study to prove it works.A friend of mine who is a family doctor and has treated hundreds of patients with Ivermectin swears that the suppression of Ivermectin is one of the saddest most engaging storied that came out if the Covid era. Apparently we all have our own version of truth.
What it does for other issues is irrelevant to the treatment of Covid 19What would your explanation be for the instantaneous mass-labeling it as "horse paste," despite its widespread use in humans, which likely saves hundreds of thousands of lives a year and earned it the Nobel prize?
That wasn't my point. Where did "horse paste" come from? Because I've never heard ivermectin called that in my 23+ years of being a physician.What it does for other issues is irrelevant to the treatment of Covid 19
Who has more influence on what you prescribe?
Insurance and what they’ll pay for of pharmaceutical companies
Never make fun of flat earthers, you seem to take the same satisfaction they do with being wrong.This article was written in 22. At that time ic claimed 78 studies were “promising “ for the treatment of covid 19 with ivermectin.
Here’s one from the list I picked at random.
Yet another study shows little benefit for ivermectin with COVID-19
The observed median time to first recovery was 14 days in the ivermectin group and 15 in the usual-care group.www.cidrap.umn.edu
It concluded the ivermectin should not be used to treat covid 19.
Or…..
Overall, these findings, while evidencing a small benefit in symptom duration, do not support the use of ivermectin as treatment for COVID-19.
Guess what the other 3 I checked said.
He should preform a study to prove it works.
Nobody else has been able to.
Here’s reality.
Insurance companies run medical. Not pharmaceutical companies. Insurance wants one of 2 things. They want you to heal quickly or die quickly. The problem with Covid 19 early was it was sending people to the hospital and not killing them quickly. The insurance industry sponsored 43 studies on ivermectin and 65 on Hydroxychloroquine. The insurance industry was desperate for something that would help make people better quickly.
It’s ok if you want to take it. Have at it. But the red woman didn’t survive liver cancer by messing around with things we hope would work.
I don’t object to the use of ivermectin. I absolutely object to the bull **** boogeyman argument that some supervillains were suppressing it when the people who actually control things were desperate for it to work