Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,845
I fully realize that. But I'm only saying that we seem to have a different tolerance level for vaccine related deaths between 1976 and now. That is all I'm highlighting. Not aimed at you directly, just pointing out the discrepancy.Moving the goalposts.
I’ve not argued for mandates. I’m opposed to them.
I've didn't say the vaccine should not be made available. I said it shouldn't be mandatory.Your arguing that it should not be available because of a minimal risk while arguing for ivermectin which also has a minimal risk and kills a few people. I say both should be available.
In this case you lack consistency.
Swine flu 'debacle' of 1976 is recalled - Los Angeles Times (latimes.com)
All it took was 25 deaths back then, but we can accept 6985 now? Not saying the program should be cancelled, but just saying that it isn't even as safe and effective as the shot that went out nearly 45 years ago.
Speculative.
Again, the point is that the program was stopped after less than 50 deaths from the vaccine. There is no reason to make an experimental vaccine mandatory.