IluvdoubleD's
Sir Loves
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2012
- Messages
- 18,454
- Likes
- 8,626
If true it looks like the move of a man who is wanting to negotiate his way out of this. I'm no expert but I don't believe their nuclear subs carry battlefield nukes. No way are they going to land a first strike a NATO capitol or military base.So the Poseidon is a nuclear capable underwater UAS I don’t understand why a nuke capable UAS would be useful here unless the Russians are considering targeting NATO country capital ships IE carriers.
Russian submarine Belgorod (K-329) - Wikipedia
Reading up on the weapon it has a dirty bomb configuration so that it could be used as a coastal population center strike. The two prominent uses appear to be carrier strike group or coastal population strike. This is all highly speculative though since there’s a question on if the weapon is actually developed and ready to deploy tooIf true it looks like the move of a man who is wanting to negotiate his way out of this. I'm no expert but I don't believe their nuclear subs carry battlefield nukes. No way are they going to land a first strike a NATO capitol or military base.
1. Going to war or provoking war with a nuclear power (China) is a greater risk than developing our own domestic chip production. In the meantime, maybe... just maybe, we would be better served to not be provocative and instead employ diplomacy.
2. Well your last sentence is ridiculous and has nothing to do with the message I am saying, which is that the countries you mentioned that are in that area have just as much of an interest in the China/Taiwan relationship as we do. Suggesting they put the most skin in the game isn't outlandish. Suggesting they do ALL of the load carrying in their region isn't outlandish either.
3. Nothing in this last rant of your refuted what I posted. You saying that there will be bargains available in the next half decade goes in line with what I said about most investors begging for a 15k DOW.
Yeah, the German peoples will. The people that work to supply the German army, won’t rise up against the NAZI government. You act like an army and government are completely separate from the civilian population and that’s ignorant.
No it’s not a reasonable assumption, it’s ****ing stupid.
Live to strategically regroup another day
large numbers didn’t live though, Russian corpses littered the land.
i say lets go ahead and get it over with, but let everyone know when its gonna happen. I wanna spend my last hours on earth on a high noteIf and when nuclear war ever happens, I hope it isn't over Ukraine lol or any other useless European nation including England. If I am going to die a slow, painful death I hope it's because we were attacked.
Except that's not true anymore. They have declining populations.
belorusians would riot and the minorities in the east +the muslims are already sick of itWell Russia certainly doesn't have bodies from Ukraine and all the other ex-Soviet satellites to throw into the fray, but they've always seen life as cheap when it comes to the non-ruling class, so you have to think they'll sacrifice what they have and anybody else (like Belarusians) that they can buy or otherwise drag in. Who knows, Putin seems to think a lot of Ukrainians are Russian anyway - same with Crimea. Your point may also be why Putin is pushing the nuclear threat - he understands that the cupboard is not as well stocked with cannon fodder as his will to push them into battle, and you have to suppose facing the reality that his thoughts about being a dictator don't go nearly as far these days as they used to.
I don’t get it. According to our rezident Putin apologists, Russia is winning this war on all fronts. Why the nuclear weapons talk? Instead of conscripting cannon fodder, where are all the supposedly elite Russian troops that were recently playing war games with China and India?
Ras's thinking on that completely ignores our antiwar movement during Vietnam and ultimately the policy - and Ras's own thinking about our later actions around the globe. Ras may be in the minority here about US policy, but there are countless others of us who believe that our military actions in the sandboxes were complete futile wastes of time, energy, resources, and most of all, lives.
Another point about this particular war in Ukraine and our support is that for once we are playing the proxy war instead of being victim to a proxy war - specifically Korea and Vietnam and the "wars of liberation" sponsored by the Soviets. For another, we are finally at long last supporting an ally who is willing to fight for themselves against a major power (or supposedly so).
It's true they're (to some degree) treating the soldiers like canon fodder. My point is that with demographics now (probably unlike the past) Russia really can't afford to lose a large number of productive-age males to either the war or (fleeing from it.)Well Russia certainly doesn't have bodies from Ukraine and all the other ex-Soviet satellites to throw into the fray, but they've always seen life as cheap when it comes to the non-ruling class, so you have to think they'll sacrifice what they have and anybody else (like Belarusians) that they can buy or otherwise drag in. Who knows, Putin seems to think a lot of Ukrainians are Russian anyway - same with Crimea. Your point may also be why Putin is pushing the nuclear threat - he understands that the cupboard is not as well stocked with cannon fodder as his will to push them into battle, and you have to suppose facing the reality that his thoughts about being a dictator don't go nearly as far these days as they used to.