Who will be the Dem nominee in 20'?

#152
#152
K9Buck said:
So if a woman bangs one dude then she's obligated to bang EVERY dude, right libtard?
Click to expand...

Classy, nope but wouldn't it make sense if you are going to sell yourself on video sexually that you not discriminate based on sexuality. It is an odd way for you to seek validation, my friend.
 
#154
#154
midnight orange said:
You bring up a good point. Bisexuals are less discrimitory than heterosexuals or homosexuals. Monogamous or married people are probably the next level and celibate or non sexual people are the most discrimitory.
Click to expand...

I'm not trying to be crass, but how are "non sexual" people being "discriminatory" if they don't engage in sex with ANYONE?

On another note, is there something wrong about being "discriminatory" about whom one engages with in sex?
 
#155
#155
zaqhhh said:
Classy, nope but wouldn't it make sense if you are going to sell yourself on video sexually that you not discriminate based on sexuality. It is an odd way for you to seek validation, my friend.
Click to expand...

Porn "stars" have standards bro.















Seriously..one said that to me.
 
#156
#156
zaqhhh said:
If we have to make a cutoff where rich is defined as a income limit then this is where I believe it is. Like I said, there should be many tiers though.
Click to expand...

Everyone is supposed to be equal right? Then everyone pays an equal amount. Equality! YAY!
 
#157
#157
zaqhhh said:
Classy, nope but wouldn't it make sense if you are going to sell yourself on video sexually that you not discriminate based on sexuality. It is an odd way for you to seek validation, my friend.
Click to expand...

How do you know she discriminated against him because of his "sexuality"? The likely reason that she opted NOT to have sex with him is because of the high rates of STD's among gay porn "actors". But that's not a sufficient reason for you, is it? She's OBLIGATED to screw gay porn stars since she's already banging straight porn stars, right?
 
#158
#158
FLVOL_79 said:
Porn actors/actresses discriminate against each other constantly. Some girls won't bang dudes. Some dudes won't bang girls. Some girls won't bang blacks, some will. Some girls won't bang anyone but their husband/boyfriend (lol).

Ames suicide is absolutely a product of an oversensitive selective liberal victim\be offended culture...and daddy issues I am sure.
Click to expand...

There is a huge difference in someone not having sex with a specific sex as that is a biological disposition. To discriminate based on someone's orientation is very different. You are already attracted to and having sex with males, but a gay male is a no?

Sounds like she should have been in a different industry. However, like I said I think it is saddening she committed suicide.

I can think of 100 better gotcha subjects as a Leftist that I could attack my own ideology on. The fact that K9 chose that seems to be a testament to the weakness of his own ideology/political prowess.
 
#159
#159
FLVOL_79 said:
Everyone is supposed to be equal right? Then everyone pays an equal amount. Equality! YAY!
Click to expand...

Libertarianism! What should we do to better societal conditions? Economic outcomes? Climate Change? Anything? Nothing...

magic-conch.jpeg
 
#161
#161
K9Buck said:
How do you know she discriminated against him because of his "sexuality"? The likely reason that she opted NOT to have sex with him is because of the high rates of STD's among gay porn "actors". But that's not a sufficient reason for you, is it? She's OBLIGATED to screw gay porn stars since she's already banging straight porn stars, right?
Click to expand...

The expectation would be that if you are having sex with men and your only thing against someone is their orientation then you are in the wrong industry. All I am saying.

Same conservative/evangelical selective outrage that rails against LGBT, but opens Roy Moore with open arms.
 
#163
#163
zaqhhh said:
The expectation would be that if you are having sex with men and your only thing against someone is their orientation then you are in the wrong industry. All I am saying.
Click to expand...

What you're not acknowledging is the high STD rate among gay, male porn actors. She wasn't alone in that may other female, porn actors refuse to engage in sex with gay, male, porn actors. Are you saying they are all obligated to have sex with gay, male porn actors since they have sex with heterosexual, porn actors? The STD rate should NOT be a consideration?
 
#164
#164
hog88 said:
No, it’s comfortable but you still HAVE to work. Rich is working if you want.
Click to expand...
But, if you make 500k a year for a few years, and invest 1/2 of what is left after taxes, then you won't have to work. I don't have to work, have no retirement other than putting money aside and investing in the stock market, and never made anywhere close to 500k.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#165
#165
K9Buck said:
What you're not acknowledging is the high STD rate among gay, male porn actors. She wasn't alone in that may other female, porn actors refuse to engage in sex with gay, male, porn actors. Are you saying they are all obligated to have sex with gay, male porn actors since they have sex with heterosexual, porn actors? The STD rate should NOT be a consideration?
Click to expand...

The STD rate among porn actors period is high. It is selective outrage, why not work in a different industry? There are plenty of areas of work which have 0 risk of disease. There are plenty of precautions one can take to avoid transmission as well. Lets also remember that not only did she refuse, but then subsequently decided to make it a public issue by yelling about it on twitter.

Could people have been nicer? Yes
Was she at fault also? Yes
Would this have even been an issue had she not made it one on twitter? Probably not

And aren't conservatives always touting personal responsibility? I have made several moves on social media that have been controversial and I have had death threats levied against me.

But if I act, I understand that keyboard warriors may come after me. I don't go and consider suicide.
 
#166
#166
zaqhhh said:
The STD rate among porn actors period is high. It is selective outrage, why not work in a different industry? There are plenty of areas of work which have 0 risk of disease. There are plenty of precautions one can take to avoid transmission as well. Lets also remember that not only did she refuse, but then subsequently decided to make it a public issue by yelling about it on twitter.

Could people have been nicer? Yes
Was she at fault also? Yes
Would this have even been an issue had she not made it one on twitter? Probably not

And aren't conservatives always touting personal responsibility? I have made several moves on social media that have been controversial and I have had death threats levied against me.

But if I act, I understand that keyboard warriors may come after me. I don't go and consider suicide.
Click to expand...

For once I mostly agree with you.
 
#167
#167
zaqhhh said:
The STD rate among porn actors period is high. It is selective outrage, why not work in a different industry? There are plenty of areas of work which have 0 risk of disease. There are plenty of precautions one can take to avoid transmission as well. Lets also remember that not only did she refuse, but then subsequently decided to make it a public issue by yelling about it on twitter.

Could people have been nicer? Yes
Was she at fault also? Yes
Would this have even been an issue had she not made it one on twitter? Probably not

And aren't conservatives always touting personal responsibility? I have made several moves on social media that have been controversial and I have had death threats levied against me.

But if I act, I understand that keyboard warriors may come after me. I don't go and consider suicide.
Click to expand...

Wrong. You can get Necrotizing fasciitis literally anywhere.
 
#168
#168
K9Buck said:
For once I mostly agree with you.
Click to expand...

I've always been a believer in the quote that says you should never agree with anyone 100% of the time. Goes both ways. No matter who one debates, one should always be able to find a semblance of common ground.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#169
#169
FLVOL_79 said:
Porn "stars" have standards bro.













Seriously..one said that to me.
Click to expand...


Reminds me of the greatest episode of Cops, ever.

[YouTube] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JkwZUk3Kng[/YouTube]
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#170
#170
zaqhhh said:
There is a huge difference in someone not having sex with a specific sex as that is a biological disposition. To discriminate based on someone's orientation is very different. You are already attracted to and having sex with males, but a gay male is a no?

Sounds like she should have been in a different industry. However, like I said I think it is saddening she committed suicide.

I can think of 100 better gotcha subjects as a Leftist that I could attack my own ideology on. The fact that K9 chose that seems to be a testament to the weakness of his own ideology/political prowess.
Click to expand...

Wait..so you think people can not have sex with a specific sex because of "biology" and thats ok but are against people having sex with certain people because of their potentially poor choices which is based on biology? Um..sure..?...:unsure:

So roleplay here a bit..you meet a girl..she is a junky..has AIDS, hepatitis A, B, C, herpes simplex C... Do you still bang? OR do you not bang? Are you discriminating because you don't like girls? Or is it the AIDS/ hepatitis, herpes ?..
 
#171
#171
Septic said:
Reminds me of the greatest episode of Cops, ever.

[YouTube] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_JkwZUk3Kng[/YouTube]
Click to expand...

I easily see that lady being a politician.



I f#%#ng love COPS (the show).

Mandatory viewing for people so they learn how not to ruin their lives.
 
Last edited:
#172
#172
1972 Grad said:
But, if you make 500k a year for a few years, and invest 1/2 of what is left after taxes, then you won't have to work. I don't have to work, have no retirement other than putting money aside and investing in the stock market, and never made anywhere close to 500k.
Click to expand...

Kids?
 
#174
#174
zaqhhh said:
Was waiting for this argument, nearly all the new wealth in the past 50 years has gone to the top earners. So now I should have sympathy that they pay the majority already?

Yeah, not happening. Nothing that we are doing now nor Bernie/I are proposing is going to have them struggling to survive.
Click to expand...

My point is you tout the plurality, when 50% have no skin in the game. So of course they want single payer. And free college. And free housing. And guaranteed income.
 
#175
#175
1972 Grad said:
None so far for me, but you didn't bring that up to begin with. I figure that saved me a few hundred grand.
Click to expand...

Oh most definitely.

I could probably have retired if it wasn’t for kids or if we’d have just treated them worse.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top