you have said yourself it is a difficult disease to diagnose, even if that is what you are looking for. It makes sense that Lyme could easily have been going for all time and just been miss diagnosed. we still have diseases today, besides Lyme, being miss diagnosed, and new ones 'coming out'/being discovered and evolving naturally.
you are right i know nothing about the disease, which is why i am skeptical about all the information i read on it. in this case, weaponised Lyme, i read the support of it from the same websites that host other information i have debunked quite easily from other Google searches. the OP is much more valid than some of the websites, but i approached their information with a noted bias formed from prior research.
maybe the reason patient zero was identified was because you had the expert right there, not that patient zero was the actual first case.
It is difficult to diagnose because the CDC and IDSA, both government agencies, do not have the diagnostic and treatment regimens in place for this disease.
If you look up Lyme on CDC.gov you will see completely different statistics than the doctors who are finding it outside their guidelines.
If a doctor suspects it, he completes the steps provided by CDC and IDSA. By doing this, it will be missed. Dr Richard Horowitz and others are pushing for change.
Have you listened to what Dr. Burgdoferi, the founder of Borriella burgdoferi, has to say about this disease? You tube it.
It has spread by many reasons such as through animal migration, blood transfusions, and by placenta.
Again, your opinion is your own, but I invite anyone to live with this illness for 1 week. Let it completely change your life, go to IV clinics, shoot your thighs with injections every day, live with side effects of meds,
Live this, talk to people with it,
Then and only then will I listen to your opinion.