It is absolutely idiotic. The silliness about scale of liberalism was even more dense. Berkeley and UVA couldn't be more different, yet both are universally acclaimed as top tier institutions. Hell, the govt owns my Alma mater and it is conservative as it can be.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Where's the lie and why the absurdity about one coax on earth being able to make a field of 68. Your boy is crawling in on his back this year with the most talent he's had.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Touché. Point stands.
Must be my public / private education.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
There are at least two NBA players on this roster. His inability to provide any of the skills you lament.I don't understand the talent argument. No pg, no post, no shooters. I don't know how that equals the most talent he's had. Athletes? Yes. Ball players? No way. He wouldn't have been picked 4th in the east in the preseason if those in the know thought a 2 time sec coach of the year had his most talented team.
Going back to your point. There are coaches who could do as good of a job of Bruce. But if you don't think Bruce has done an excellent job with this program than you are delusional. If you think we are just going to roll at anybody and they are going to do a better job than Bruce, you are delusional. If you think that we are going to get a top-tier, proven coach, you are delusional. There is probably some guy out there that we can get who can do the job. But we don't know who he is. It's a crapshoot trying to replace him with our options.
Don't be stupid. Your point was that all are the same and it was senseless. Silliness about liberal quotient just made it dumber.Is it that hard to understand? The fact that you have to point out a few specific conservative schools, just proves that most of them are liberal.
Going back to your point. There are coaches who could do as good of a job of Bruce. But if you don't think Bruce has done an excellent job with this program than you are delusional. If you think we are just going to roll out anybody and they are going to do a better job than Bruce, you are delusional. If you think that we are going to get a top-tier, proven coach, you are delusional. There is probably some guy out there that we can get who can do the job. But we don't know who he is. It's a crapshoot trying to replace him with our options.
There are at least two NBA players on this roster. His inability to provide any of the skills you lament.
Bad for you that your argument is a dead end either way. One, the player development, skill coaching, evaluation and recruiting suck; the other, the prep and game coaching suck. Nice point.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
That's the new diversion the Pearlophiles and Pearl's sycophants in the media are trying to use. They believe if they act like this is all about people wating him fired for this year's lousy product, the 'AA issues will be obscured. Just another attempt at the smoke and mirrors approach the piece of trash has built his entire career on over the years.Who's arguing that the atrocious underperformance is the reason people want a change?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Exactly, which goes back to one of the early points in the thread. Is our goal to punish Bruce, or to be a good basketball program?
Relative to?My point should have simply been, none of them are good. Some may be better than others, they all suck.
Ernie Kent has two Elite Eights on his resume. Pretty sure he won't be getting a call from the folks in Springfield or Kansas City any time soon.He can turn around programs. Beyond that, we've seen nearly nothing. This debate exists because of our moribund history as a comparison point, not because we've achieved greatness. Freaking Stan Heath couldn't coach his way out of a paper sack and stumbled ass backward to the E8.
Posted via VolNation Mobile