MemphisCanes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2011
- Messages
- 4,794
- Likes
- 51
MemphisCanes said:Where do I sign?
Let's not forget this is not just one school. It's one school getting in trouble for something that goes on at just about big ncaa school that has a top athletic program. Yeah what happened was stupid, but right now it's allegations not facts. And all coming from a convicted felon.I'm sure that telling the whole truth is what got him in trouble in the first place.
Miami should not be allowed to give football scholarships for 2 years. They can field a team, but it has to be made up of walkons. No bowl ban, no TV ban (that hurts the other schools too much), no death penalty. It's exactly what Miami deserves.
If the 4 year statute of limitations holds, the NCAA will be able to look back to 2007-2008 (if I understand the rule correctly). Randy Shannon was in full effect then, and Shapiro himself says that the U was tightening restrictions between boosters and players. Although there are 12 current players implicated, I haven't heard what they're implicated for. That's roughly the amount implicated at UNC if I'm not mistaken.
If for some reason the NCAA can bring in the older issues, things look a lot worse for the U.
Let's not forget this is not just one school. It's one school getting in trouble for something that goes on at just about big ncaa school that has a top athletic program. Yeah what happened was stupid, but right now it's allegations not facts. And all coming from a convicted felon.I'm sure that telling the whole truth is what got him in trouble in the first place.
:lol: That's what I was thinking.
Not a lawyer, but I think this is way past the allegation stage. Looks like this is established fact. 20,000 pages of corroborating evidence.
I know, you're a UM fan, though, so you need some hope.
Way, way, way too light. If the allegations are true, only fitting punishment is disband the football team, with Miami able to apply for permission to field one in, say, 7-10 years.
Read elsewhere that the SOL is tolled (meaning extended) if there is a pattern of breaking of rules where last acts fall within the four years. Meaning that the NCAA can go back as far as the pattern takes them, i.e. the entire period.
First, agree that right now its just allegations. The fact that former players and others are confirming gives it a high degree credibility, but still not proven.
Second, I don;t think the "this happens everywhere" defense is going to go very far given the extreme nature of what reportedly went on here. Especially given the scope.
You have to remember that Miami intentionally built, and then promoted, an image as a bit of a high flying, renegade program. Their sidelines typically populated by some unsavory folks, some celebrities of dubious character and distinction, strip club owners, etc. Miami marketed itself as the place to be for a pretty rough element, on its way to the NFL.
That marketing worked. But at some point it looks like the hype became the reality. And not just once or twice, or with one or two players. With dozens, and with coaches not just knowing but participating.
Miami is going to reap what it sowed. And it will and should be ugly.
Way, way, way too light. If the allegations are true, only fitting punishment is disband the football team, with Miami able to apply for permission to field one in, say, 7-10 years.
I can see, as a Florida fan, why you would want this punishment. And I thought there would be no possible way you could wriggle out of that 2013 game.
I had forgotten about scheduling that game. Crap. Wonder if anyone has an open date we can make fit since by then ... well.... you know.
I've read where the SOL can be tolled under a "wilfull misconduct" clause. Haven't heard anything about an "ongoing pattern" exception or the like, although I think I hard John and Jimmy saying something to that effect yesterday afternoon. I don't have the definition of "wilfull misconduct" or any idea about it's application.
I don't know the particulars, either. But, if Miami's argument in the end is that "nanny nanny boo boo, you can only get us for some of this stuff" you can bet that when punishment time comes along the committee would take into account all of the other corroborated stuff.
Who knows if the NCAA will take into account Miami's reputation and the trouble it got into in the 90s. That was a long time ago, and there have been several regime changes since then. However, it appears as though some of the culture around the program may have never changed.
I'm not saying the committee would take into account their image. I mean, I take it into account in viewing that program as a blight on college athletics. As a college football fan, I don't deny that.
But the committee should not consider Miami's "reputation." That would be wrong.
In the end, if this stuff is true, Miami's reputation going into it won't really matter.
Let's not forget this is not just one school. It's one school getting in trouble for something that goes on at just about big ncaa school that has a top athletic program. Yeah what happened was stupid, but right now it's allegations not facts. And all coming from a convicted felon.I'm sure that telling the whole truth is what got him in trouble in the first place.
Way, way, way too light. If the allegations are true, only fitting punishment is disband the football team, with Miami able to apply for permission to field one in, say, 7-10 years.
Read elsewhere that the SOL is tolled (meaning extended) if there is a pattern of breaking of rules where last acts fall within the four years. Meaning that the NCAA can go back as far as the pattern takes them, i.e. the entire period.
First, agree that right now its just allegations. The fact that former players and others are confirming gives it a high degree credibility, but still not proven.
Second, I don;t think the "this happens everywhere" defense is going to go very far given the extreme nature of what reportedly went on here. Especially given the scope.
You have to remember that Miami intentionally built, and then promoted, an image as a bit of a high flying, renegade program. Their sidelines typically populated by some unsavory folks, some celebrities of dubious character and distinction, strip club owners, etc. Miami marketed itself as the place to be for a pretty rough element, on its way to the NFL.
That marketing worked. But at some point it looks like the hype became the reality. And not just once or twice, or with one or two players. With dozens, and with coaches not just knowing but participating.
Miami is going to reap what it sowed. And it will and should be ugly.
Every time a program gets in deep hot water, we see these tired old arguments.
1) Everybody does it, we just got caught.
2) Let's compare something way less significant and try to come up with a reason we should get the same.
3) Everybody hates us because we are so good (we haven't seen that one, yet, but its coming).
4) Statute of limitations.
5) Its not fair to punish the kids and coaches there now for what was done in the past.
And then ultimately ....
We have a damn good tennis team.
I love it that the Gator fans are standing in judgment. Nice to see that these comments aren't coming from a place of bias.
all schools have issues to a certain extent. All of them are fighting off boosters who want to be dumbaszzes. Very few have problems as big as what the U is about to have.I agree. I guess Miami is the only school with issues.
WTF. So if I were SpartanBill, or VolBill, my points would be more valid.
I was born and raised in Lansing, MI. I attended UF (after turning down a full ride to UT) and MSU.
Most importantly I am a College Football Fan. None of my points on this subject are built on Gator bias. They are built on 40 something years of loving the game of college football.
Im sorry I didnt post my resume' before posting on the subject.
And thanks for leaving your bias at the dinner table before bellying up to the keyboard also. :hi: eace2:
I'm not saying that is in any way a defense for Miami. It just makes me chuckle that the Gator fans in this thread are the ones screaming for The U's head the loudest.