fade route
Just being honest
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2011
- Messages
- 17,397
- Likes
- 16,185
I would like to see them improve over the previous guy in year one. Jones didn't but that's not enough to condemn him.
I would like to definitely see improvement in year 2. Considering the youthful talent, even one more win and a bowl game would be acceptable and in my mind "promising".
By year 3, I would like to see the Vols at least in the conversation for the East with a major bowl bid.
This "standard" doesn't really change because there is a very pragmatic, "realistic" reason behind it.
To compete, UT needs out of state talent. Jones did what he needed to do with the '14 class. DD btw did it with the class Kiffin left him. Both scored early recruiting successes. Both have gotten passes of sorts for early results. But to keep the recruiting going, a UT coach MUST show improvement in year 2 and then start competing in year 3. That's the only way to keep the recruits coming.
This goes all the way back to an observation I made during Fulmer's last days. Recruiting was good and kept being "good" even though the team somewhat underperformed and began to slip in the early '00's. Then 2005 happened. The class of 2006 reflected that slip but on paper 2007 looked like a nice recovery. Continued questions about blowout losses and team discipline led to Fulmer's worst recruiting class ever in 2008. Then he was fired.
UT must have results on the field regardless of who the coach is in order to recruit competitively out of state. Tenure and stability... won't replace wins. Promises won't replace wins. UT has to WIN. If a coach isn't winning then UT cannot afford to keep him longer than 3 years... 4 years absolute max. If a UT HC has not won more than 8 games by year 4, he definitely needs to go... and especially if there are blowout losses and 2 or 3 losing records.
Pretty much agree with everything. I would add that if we keep getting scored on in bunches this year, Butch needs to take a long hard look at Jancek and Martinez.