VolBuck24
That's the truth, Truth
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2009
- Messages
- 2,064
- Likes
- 2
the NBA values those who will be most effective playing under the NBA's very unique set of rules. Steve Alford just happens not to be that guy.I said that shooters were ONLY TAKEN HIGH IF they were among the nation's leading scorers. That is very different from saying that all leading scorers get drafted high.
More athletic players, on the other hand, do not necessarily have to put up huge numbers because the scouts value their athleticism in the NBA. Shooters have to prove that they can score despite their lack of athleticism usually. So they have to put up huge numbers to be drafted high, when athletic players just have to have decent ones. Therefore, the NBA values athleticism over shooting.
Indiana in '87 and Kentucky in '98 are the only teams in recent history to win an NCAA title without a player who went on to have a significant NBA career.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Chris Lofton is an awful all around player who's too small to dream about getting his shot off at the NBA level and couldn't guard anyone drawing a check in that league. Also, what was his FG% last year? Further, since it's all about athleticism, when does Asumnu start getting his NBA money? Remind me how many all star games Michael Wilson played in? I can't believe Vegas Davis isn't pulling big NBA cash.
If a guy isn't a shooter by the time he's in his 20's it's likely to never happen.
Once again proving the point that athleticism is valued more than shooting.
What? Those are your examples? There isn't an NBA team in the league who won't give those guys jumpers all day long.
I didn't realize the foul line, where Wade did the majority of his damage in those Finals, constituted jump shots.Yea the mavricks did it in the finals and look how great that worked out. His 3pt % is nothing spectacular but hes got a sick mid range game.
Harris is becoming an incredible shooter and the star of the Nets. There are tons more as you said.
You saying this is like saying the NFL values athleticism over tackling. There are so many more factors other than he can shoot/tackle or he can't and he's athletic.
Most corners don't tackle well (Deon) but they don't need to. If your linebacker is athletic but can't tackle, that's a large problem.
Big Z for the Cavs is a very good shooter but is not athletic. Shaq is super athletic but not a shooter.
There are just so many factors about a teams needs and what a specific player can do that you can't say it's just about athleticism or shooting.
"Incredible Shooter" Devin Harris= 44.2% from the field, 31.8% from 3.Yea the mavricks did it in the finals and look how great that worked out. His 3pt % is nothing spectacular but hes got a sick mid range game.
Harris is becoming an incredible shooter and the star of the Nets. There are tons more as you said.
Everyone? I forgot how plugged in you are to NBA scouts. Yeah, you're going to see everyone pushing out on Harris to take away the threat of him taking shots he makes with about 30% regularity and force him to drive.You obviously watch the NBA... He's getting props left and right. I said he is becoming, as everyone does. People get better at shooting throughout their careers :crazy:
Big Z is also 7 feet tall. All I'm trying to say is that with practice just about anyone can become a good shooter, great no, but really good. You cannot teach people to be incredibly athletic. In accordance with your point athleticism is what allows you to be great at the other parts of the game. Lets see, on ball defense, ball handling, etc. All things that can be improved with practice.