Putin Wants To Debate Biden

#101
#101
NorthDallas40 said:
I never said attempted coup. I clearly said coup. You offered a definition of coup ... which you agreed doesn’t apply. And you’ve been sliding goal posts ever since trying to claim a concurrence which does not exist.
🤡
Click to expand...
I assume that you know the definition of “attempted.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: tvolsfan
#104
#104
RockyTop85 said:
Yes. It’s what you were when you said I linked to the cline center... and when you said I haven’t been consistent in characterizing this coup as unsuccessful.
Click to expand...
Oh so now you want to deflect away from your incorrect entry to today’s foray? You know... where you provided a definition which you agree didn’t apply. And even tried to dunk on it.
🤡
 
#105
#105
NorthDallas40 said:
Oh so now you want to deflect away from your incorrect entry to today’s foray? You know... where you provided a definition which you agree didn’t apply. And even tried to dunk on it.
🤡
Click to expand...

Not at all. I totally acknowledge the fact that the failed coup did not topple the government. I did so in that post, in fact.
 
#106
#106
RockyTop85 said:
Not at all. I totally acknowledge the fact that the failed coup did not topple the government. I did so in that post, in fact.
Click to expand...
You’re still trying to insert terms which are of your own and not applicable by your own definition.

Let me make it clear and simple for you. You’re wrong.
 
#107
#107
Weezer said:
Remember when Reagan and Gorbachev ended the Cold War? It's not out of the realm of possibility for us to be allies, or at least get along with each other.
Click to expand...

big-three-stalin-roosevelt-churchill-gettyimages-615313038.jpg
 
#108
#108
NorthDallas40 said:
You’re still trying to insert terms which are of your own and not applicable by your own definition.

Let me make it clear and simple for you. You’re wrong.
Click to expand...

Objecting to the appropriate use adjectives is an interesting tactic...

Yeah, no, I think I’m good with leaving it at that.
 
#109
#109
RockyTop85 said:
Objecting to the appropriate use adjectives is an interesting tactic...

Yeah, no, I think I’m good with leaving it at that.
Click to expand...
No I’m objecting to you incorrectly describing an act merely so you can use loaded and inflammatory language to gin up an over reaction. Which is what you’ve done since day one on this. And you’re still wrong on your assertion. 🤡
 
#112
#112
BigOrangeTrain said:
Is this your best defense?
Click to expand...

This is such a silly, Fox News-manufactured non-issue. What do Putin and Biden have to debate? They're not running for the same office. They don't run the same country. There's no election coming up. We know both of their policy positions.

Is this faux machismo normal people don't get? Is this part of the 5'4, 115lb Ben Shapiro ethos of "Debate me, coward"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tyler Durden
#113
#113
NorthDallas40 said:
No I’m objecting to you incorrectly describing an act merely so you can use loaded and inflammatory language to gin up an over reaction. Which is what you’ve done since day one on this. And you’re still wrong on your assertion. 🤡
Click to expand...
Right, I understand that’s what you’re trying to do, but if “adjectives not allowed” is the best you can come up with, I’m good with leaving it at that.
 
#115
#115
evillawyer said:
This is such a silly, Fox News-manufactured non-issue. What do Putin and Biden have to debate? They're not running for the same office. They don't run the same country. There's no election coming up. We know both of their policy positions.

Is this faux machismo normal people don't get? Is this part of the 5'4, 115lb Ben Shapiro ethos of "Debate me, coward"?
Click to expand...
Oh I don’t know. Since election interference by Russia seems to be a hot topic let’s hear the dementia patient make his case and hear Putin’s rebuttal of the claim. And I don’t blame you sister I’d be scared to death to let him anywhere near this.
 
#116
#116
RockyTop85 said:
Right, I understand that’s what you’re trying to do, but if “adjectives not allowed” is the best you can come up with, I’m good with leaving it at that.
Click to expand...
Projection now how. Look pettifogger it’s not my fault you’re not as good a bull **** salesman as you think you are that’s on you. Womp womp.
 
#118
#118
evillawyer said:
How would one counter such strong arguments in a debate? I mean, wow, the "takes one to know one" move. How could Joe possibly counter that? Putin should have just concluded QED, and dropped the mic. Definitely has some world class skillz on the debate stage.
Click to expand...
Hey, genius. Putin didn't say "it takes one to know one" because Biden had called him a "doofus" or a "dork" in the school yard during recess. He responded back like this over a claim of being called a murderer. Let that sink in for a moment...
 
#122
#122
evillawyer said:
This is such a silly, Fox News-manufactured non-issue. What do Putin and Biden have to debate? They're not running for the same office. They don't run the same country. There's no election coming up. We know both of their policy positions.

Is this faux machismo normal people don't get? Is this part of the 5'4, 115lb Ben Shapiro ethos of "Debate me, coward"?
Click to expand...

I don’t want Biden embarrassing us more than he already has. So I can see why you don’t want him to do anything live. I mean he can barely walk up stairs, string coherent sentences together or remember if he or Kamala is president.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
#124
#124
BigOrangeTrain said:
Try answering the question
Click to expand...
He won’t. He’s trying to play the attempted coup loaded language game again. Since we of course are not an autocracy he will point to the attempted coup’s failure as proof of him being right.

Again he’s no where near the bull **** salesman he thinks he is in his minuscule brain.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain
#125
#125
BigOrangeTrain said:
Try answering the question
Click to expand...
I forgot you were dumb for a minute.

I have answered it, at least a dozen times on this forum. And the answer to my question makes the answer to yours obvious.

Their goal was to bypass the constitutional process for selection of the executive. That would have created a new type of government in America. Something akin to an autocracy.

So, yes. It was an attempt to change the government.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top