LebanonVolunteer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,695
- Likes
- 1,376
After reading the entire thread, that is the one believable thing he has said, Leb.
I'm not much of a pessimist, but I'll give it a shot:
Today whilst doing the deed with my girlfriend I think I might have broken my star player.
Wheew! That felt good to get off my chest! I should give this pessimism thing a shot more often!
I'm the one looking for factual results, not making them up. Don't hate because I'm not drinking the kool-aid.
Those of you who are all in on Butch without on the field results, remember you were probably the same with Dooley. How'd that work out again?
Seriously, I hope Butch wins. I hope he rebuilds UT to what we once were. I just refuse to get my hopes up without seeing results first. I expect this season will be rough(replacing the entire OL), but I expect to see improvement throughout the season. If that doesn't happen, we have a problem. A coach needs to be able to coach. I think this season will show us a lot.
I'm glad you understood my post. That FSU team I used was ranked 10th in the country. Auburn's 8th ranked class had 2 5-stars, 9 4-stars, and 12 3-stars. Ole Miss had the 7th ranked class and they brought in 15 3-stars. aTm had 15 3-stars and 15 4-stars.
I never said rankings don't correlate with success. All those teams brought in a bunch of 3-stars, and had great classes. A simple check on rivals shows that.
The original point of the OP was a healthy dose of skepticism for bringing in a 5'10" 4.7 CB (for example) when we have more pressing needs on limited space. My point is the remaining spots should be saved for big names. It will probably work itself out. The rest of VN can carry on with the usual name calling and "Butch gets it!" To anyone with a dissenting opinion.
There is 1 reason I am all in on Butch Jones at least for now. He is a proven winner. When Dave Hart fired a career loser in Derek Dooley, all I wanted to see Hart do was hire a guy who had shown he could win at least at some level. Hart did that in hiring Jones and I am onboard till he shows me he can't get it done. What I have seen thus far, I am glad I was one of the ones early on pushing for Butch to be hired(over Strong). IMO he is doing as well as anyone could ask to this point. :good!:
I'm the one looking for factual results, not making them up. Don't hate because I'm not drinking the kool-aid.
Those of you who are all in on Butch without on the field results, remember you were probably the same with Dooley. How'd that work out again?
Seriously, I hope Butch wins. I hope he rebuilds UT to what we once were. I just refuse to get my hopes up without seeing results first. I expect this season will be rough(replacing the entire OL), but I expect to see improvement throughout the season. If that doesn't happen, we have a problem. A coach needs to be able to coach. I think this season will show us a lot.
If you have a problem with it, don't follow recruiting because it happens at every single school. Its the way of the beastFor the big names to have a spot, room will have to be made. That potentially means turning away players you have accepted commitments from. I know many on here have no problem with that idea, but some of us do. Some of us still come from a background where a man's word means something. Keeping it is keeping your integrity. I won't claim to know what's going on behind the scenes and what's being said to these young men, but if you accept their pledge knowing you may renege at a later date to get better talent(and they aren't made aware of this), then it isn't right IMO. I want to win, but not at the expense where we hinder a young man's future. If he commits to UT and shuts down the process thinking he's guaranteed a scholarship(provided he maintain his grades and not get into trouble), then he should not be recruited over.
That may not be a popular viewpoint, but it is my viewpoint. To trust a man, his word has to mean something.
"How'd that work out again?" While I was never sold on Dooley, I think that's a ridiculous question. The only logical response is, I guess the same way it would have had one questioned him or not. Your question seems to imply that being pessimistic could or would have somehow changed how the Dooley Era went. I also think it's ridiculous to be pessimistic about recruiting right now after the way the '14 class finished, added to the fact that Butch and staff have won everywhere they've been, and are known for their talent evaluations. If for some misguided reason being pessimistic makes you feel better about yourself, and like you're a better fan, I guess carry on. I just don't see the point.
For the big names to have a spot, room will have to be made. That potentially means turning away players you have accepted commitments from. I know many on here have no problem with that idea, but some of us do. Some of us still come from a background where a man's word means something. Keeping it is keeping your integrity. I won't claim to know what's going on behind the scenes and what's being said to these young men, but if you accept their pledge knowing you may renege at a later date to get better talent(and they aren't made aware of this), then it isn't right IMO. I want to win, but not at the expense where we hinder a young man's future. If he commits to UT and shuts down the process thinking he's guaranteed a scholarship(provided he maintain his grades and not get into trouble), then he should not be recruited over.
That may not be a popular viewpoint, but it is my viewpoint. To trust a man, his word has to mean something.
If you have a problem with it, don't follow recruiting because it happens at every single school. Its the way of the beast
If you have a problem with it, don't follow recruiting because it happens at every single school. Its the way of the beast
Did I claim to be a better fan? Do you believe you're a better fan? Some on here seem to think they are. Do you think every Vol fan needs to be in lockstep on their opinion? Some think everyone should follow blindly without question.
You don't have to see the point. You don't have to share my opinion. I'm not trying to sway you one way or the other. I stated an opinion, pure and simple. Others felt the need to attack the opinion rather than discuss it.
Such an extremely flawed arguement. You really want to go with the "other people are doing it too so that makes it okay" arguement? Please tell me you don't want to travel down that road. Don't let what other people do dictate your moral ethos.
Again, this happens at every school. This is one of the downsides of recruiting becoming a popular place in sports. People can't handle knowing some of the things that go on.
They don't do it because other people do it, they do it because they have to. You have to recruit that way. College football is a business and you should view it as such.
I'd wager a very large amount that not every school recruits a "full class" every season like fans on this board hopes UT does. You will note ALOT of schools do not sign even 20 some years. What that tells me is they do not take the maximum every year. Yes, even in the SEC. The concept of "well, the SEC says 25 max so we should just drop enough kids every year to take the max" will come back to bite a coaching staff who is trying to sell "family", "unity", and "foundation". If the coaches want to run things like Saban does, they should drop all the "family talk" and push the "it's a business" mindset.