NashVol11
Gloomed to Fail
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2009
- Messages
- 23,646
- Likes
- 8,392
This is partially true, which is one reason why I've long argued that Roy should take an approach to recruiting more like K and Calipari. Recruit players who should already be in the NBA, if not for a ridiculous, arbitrary rule, and make it look like you made them NBA-talent in the process. Then future top recruits, who are already NBA-ready, will think they have to continue to come to you to be made NBA-ready. It's smart really, even though it's obviously just one giant sham.
Justin Jackson is incredibly disappointing this year, especially after his freshman year seemed so promising; however, both Brice Johnson and Marcus Paige (with the exception of his last few games) have been far better than anyone ever would have thought. Outside of Jackson, it's also been a few years since Roy pulled a recruit that most analysts would expect as unquestionable NBA talent at least in the future. As far as Barnes and McAdoo are concerned, it's tough to tell. They've been manageable in the NBA, especially Barnes, but they haven't set the world on fire either. Is this merely a product of college coaching? Can NBA coaches not make players better? Golden State has been the best team in the NBA the past two seasons, so I assume they have good coaching. Similarly, we see guys who weren't really that good in college become stars in the NBA. Is this player development, or is it system? Maybe Barnes and McAdoo were just overrated out of high school. It's hard to say.
I'm not going to argue that Roy is a great coach or that he is a great developer of talent. I think he is a good coach, who is an average developer of talent. I don't think any of us should pretend, however, that Cal and K have some sort of secret to develop talent that the rest of coaches do not. They've recruited the best NBA-ready talent the past few years since the NBA rule has been in place, and they have sent players to the NBA accordingly. I don't think anything they've done in this regard has been exceptional; it just appears so.
It's nowhere near as automatic as you're making it sound. There's absolutely no debating the effect that Calipari's coaching had on guys like Randle and Towns. McAdoo was the #2 player on Ford's Big Board after his freshman year and went undrafted. He was overrated in HS, but his draft stock was still high after a year at UNC and then went straight down the toilet thereafter. Cal and K are both good at adapting their systems to highlight their players' greatest strengths and minimize their weaknesses, which is why their players get drafted often higher than they should.