He's also 6'4", so 230 isn't that heavy. He has very little upper body strength, based on what I saw last weekend. Time to go after Fournette hard!!!
Not sure if serious... But if you are your an idiot. The dude tore his shoulder in a fall that would have injured every other person on the Earth. That's neither injury prone, nor terrible upper body strength. That is a fallacy. The next drive or so, he used his "bad upper body" WITH torn shoulder to bulldoze 4 players, including Malone, for a punishing 10-15 yard touchdown.
Not sure if serious... But if you are your an idiot. The dude tore his shoulder in a fall that would have injured every other person on the Earth. That's neither injury prone, nor terrible upper body strength. That is a fallacy. The next drive or so, he used his "bad upper body" WITH torn shoulder to bulldoze 4 players, including Malone, for a punishing 10-15 yard touchdown.
Your hero goes down and that's all you can come up with? I told everybody on this site that we need to go after more running backs.
Time to make a serious move for Fournette. Hurd, as I predicted, is not a natural running back. He's too skinny in the upper body. Let's keep Hurd but try to get a natural RB. This isn't good.
And................he's out for the season. Your point?
Yeah . . . No.I think I deserve some credit on this website. Most of what I have posted, albeit controversial, has rung true. I predicted that Hurd was too tall and lanky for the running back position, and that his running style is too "upright." So when he gets injured, everyone jumps all over me. I've been watching football for many years. I've seen players come and go, and I'm pretty good at predicting probable outcomes. I like Hurd as a safety or linebacker. I DO NOT like him at running back at the college level, especially in the SEC. A shorter, more compact running back would NOT have sustained this injury. He also got injured in the first quarter, but nobody wants to talk about this.
I couldn't pick Hurd out of a lineup and I think recruiting talk is mostly reserved for a bunch of wannabes that don't know jack. I do know, however, that calling a high school kid injury prone for an awkward landing and then reaching for e-cred by saying "I told you so" is a special kind of lame.
Your hero goes down and that's all you can come up with? I told everybody on this site that we need to go after more running backs.
I think I deserve some credit on this website. Most of what I have posted, albeit controversial, has rung true. I predicted that Hurd was too tall and lanky for the running back position, and that his running style is too "upright." So when he gets injured, everyone jumps all over me. I've been watching football for many years. I've seen players come and go, and I'm pretty good at predicting probable outcomes. I like Hurd as a safety or linebacker. I DO NOT like him at running back at the college level, especially in the SEC. A shorter, more compact running back would NOT have sustained this injury. He also got injured in the first quarter, but nobody wants to talk about this.
You are either trolling or simply don't know what you are talking about. Either way you are doing nothing but making yourself look like an idiot. He runs like most of the elite larger backs and has perfect body lean when contact arrives - he drives tacklers and piles forward. I have seen people who ran too upright and he glides with great vision in the open field like the great ones.
We need a few more heroes like this.
We need healthy heroes. An injured Jalen Hurd does us no good if we don't have a replacement. I watched that game last weekend. He's a great athlete, but if you think Station Camp is a tough defense, wait until he plays teams in the SEC. He will eventually play safety or linebacker. Why does everyone get upset at that idea?